A nurse who is fired, suspended, or written up after a patient incident is usually in two matters at once. One is the job. The other is the license, because an Ohio employer that believes a nurse's conduct could be grounds for discipline must report that nurse to the Board of Nursing. What you sign and say in the first days decides how both go.
An Ohio nurse facing termination, a final warning, or a Board of Nursing complaint should treat the employment matter and the license matter as one case. Under R.C. 4723.34, an employer that has reason to believe a nurse's conduct would be grounds for discipline under R.C. 4723.28 must report the nurse to the Board, so a written statement given to HR can become the Board's file. Nurses who report patient abuse or neglect in a nursing home or residential care facility are protected from retaliation by R.C. 3721.24, and every Ohio employee has the R.C. 4113.52 whistleblower process, which has strict steps and a 180-day deadline. Sean H. Sobel advises Ohio nurses on a flat fee quoted in writing before any work begins.
Nurses are among the firm's most frequent clients: RNs and LPNs terminated after a medication error or a charting dispute, nurse managers on a performance plan after raising a staffing concern, nurses on leave who are told to bid for a new position or be let go, nurse practitioners holding a non-compete or an unpaid bonus. The work is done in writing, on a flat fee quoted before anything begins.
R.C. 4723.34 requires any person or entity that employs or contracts with a nurse, and that knows or has reason to believe the nurse engaged in conduct that would be grounds for discipline under Chapter 4723, to report the nurse's name to the Board of Nursing. The report is made by a nurse on the employer's behalf. The statute does not say "every termination," and it does not require the employer to tell you a report was made. It turns on the employer's belief about the conduct, which is why the facts you concede in an HR meeting matter so much.
R.C. 4723.28(B) lists the grounds. The ones that come up in employment cases are failing to practice according to acceptable and prevailing standards of safe nursing care (B)(19), practicing beyond the scope of the license (B)(21), impairment or habitual use of drugs or alcohol (B)(9) through (B)(11), administering or diverting drugs for other than a legitimate therapeutic purpose (B)(5), assaulting or harming a patient (B)(12), and failing to cooperate truthfully with a Board investigation (B)(39). A medication error or a documentation lapse is not automatically any of these, and an employer's internal policy is not the standard of safe nursing care. Much of the work is keeping an employer's characterization from becoming the Board's.
The Board investigates, and if it proposes discipline it must offer an adjudication under Chapter 119 of the Revised Code, with notice of the charges and the right to request a hearing within the time stated in the notice. Most matters resolve by consent agreement, which has the same effect as an order once the Board ratifies it. Discipline can range from a reprimand to a fine, probation, suspension, or revocation. Under federal law, a licensing board action that results from a formal proceeding, including a consent agreement and a surrender of the license while under investigation, is reported to the National Practitioner Data Bank, and nurses are covered. That entry follows you to every future employer that queries the Data Bank.
R.C. 4723.35 creates a confidential monitoring program for nurses who are or may be impaired and who have an unencumbered license and are not already under a Board order. Participation is not disciplinary action, and the Board refrains from disciplining a participant for the impairment itself. The program is only available before the Board acts, which is one more reason the first weeks matter.
Ohio gives nurses two statutory routes, and they work differently. Which one applies depends on where you work and what you reported.
R.C. 3721.24 prohibits a nursing home or residential care facility from retaliating against an employee, or anyone else it uses to perform work, for reporting or indicating an intent to report suspected abuse, neglect, exploitation, or misappropriation of a resident's property, or for taking part in an investigation or proceeding. Discharge, demotion, transfer, and reductions in pay, benefits, or work privileges are all covered. In Hulsmeyer v. Hospice of Southwest Ohio, Inc., 2014-Ohio-5511, the Ohio Supreme Court held that the report does not have to go to the Director of Health; a report inside the facility is enough. The statute gives the employee a direct cause of action, with damages, injunctive relief, and attorney's fees available to the prevailing party.
Outside long-term care, the main statute is R.C. 4113.52, Ohio's whistleblower law, and it is unforgiving about procedure. The employee must reasonably believe the violation is a criminal offense likely to cause imminent physical harm or a hazard to public health or safety, or a felony; must notify a supervisor orally; must follow with a written report detailed enough to identify the violation; and may go to an outside authority only if the employer does not correct the problem or make a good-faith effort to do so within 24 hours. A nurse who skips the written report, or who goes straight to the state, usually loses the statute's protection. A civil action must be filed within 180 days of the retaliatory action. Where the statute does not fit, Ohio's common-law claim for wrongful discharge in violation of public policy and the federal and state discrimination and leave statutes often do, and the analysis is done claim by claim.
None of this requires that the report turned out to be right. It requires that it was made in good faith, in the form the statute demands, before the discipline. The order of events is the case, which is why the first task is a dated timeline.
The written response to the stated reason, the request for the investigation file and your personnel records, the comparison with how other nurses were treated for the same conduct, and the negotiation of the separation terms and the wording of the reason for leaving.
Nurses who are still employed and want to stay that way. A written rebuttal that corrects the record without conceding the employer's framing, a plan for the review meetings, and the retaliation analysis where the discipline followed a leave, an injury, or a complaint. The still-employed guide explains the approach.
An accusation of diversion is the one that reaches the Board fastest and the one where a signed statement does the most damage. Whether to give a statement, what a for-cause test does and does not show, the R.C. 4723.35 program where impairment is real, and the employer's reporting obligation where it is not.
FMLA interference and retaliation, light duty and lifting restrictions after an injury, the ADA interactive process, and the common pattern of a nurse returning from leave to a changed schedule, a new unit, or a position that has been posted. The FMLA practice page covers the statute.
Employment agreements, collaboration agreements, non-competes when leaving a practice, and unpaid RVU or productivity bonuses, reviewed on a flat fee. Non-compete review and contract review start at the fees listed there.
Advice on responding to a Board inquiry so the response is complete, truthful, and consistent with what was said to the employer, since R.C. 4723.28(B)(39) makes failure to cooperate truthfully its own ground for discipline. Where a consent agreement is proposed, what it will mean for the Data Bank and for future employers.
Suspended pending investigation in Ohio and fired on medical leave cover two of the most common nurse scenarios in detail.
Advisory work for a nurse who is still employed, or who has just been terminated, is a flat fee quoted in writing before any work begins, for a scope defined at the same time: the written assessment, the responses to the employer, and the Board coordination. Where the facts support a claim against the employer, a contingency or hybrid engagement is offered instead, and the review fee is credited toward it. You will get a straight answer on which it is.
The firm represents nurses only, never the hospital or the facility, and checks for conflicts before opening any matter. That is why the first thing the firm needs is the name of the employer, not the documents. Sean Sobel handles every matter personally.
Name the employer, what has happened, and any deadline you have been given. You will get a written reply after a conflict check that says what the engagement would cover and the flat fee for that scope before anything is billed.
Do not attach or send any write-up, incident report, or Board letter yet. After a conflict check, usually the same day, you will get a written reply that says how to send it and what the engagement would cover. Submitting this form does not create an attorney-client relationship.
Every matter is different. Descriptions of typical timing, fees, and outcomes are general and do not guarantee any particular result in your case.
Not automatically. R.C. 4723.34 requires an employer to report a nurse to the Board when it knows or has reason to believe the nurse engaged in conduct that would be grounds for discipline under R.C. 4723.28. A termination for attendance, a personality conflict, or a staffing reduction is not that. A termination the employer frames as a patient safety failure, a practice-standards violation, or diversion usually is. The employer does not have to tell you a report was made; the Board will contact you if it opens a matter, and your first response to the Board should be prepared with counsel.
Not lawfully, but the protection depends on where you work and how you reported. In a nursing home or residential care facility, R.C. 3721.24 protects an employee who reports or indicates an intent to report suspected abuse or neglect of a resident, and the Ohio Supreme Court held in Hulsmeyer v. Hospice of Southwest Ohio, 2014-Ohio-5511, that a report inside the facility is enough. Elsewhere, R.C. 4113.52 protects a report only if you notified a supervisor orally, followed with a written report, and gave the employer 24 hours to correct the problem before going outside, and any lawsuit must be filed within 180 days. Where neither statute fits, a public policy wrongful discharge claim may.
You can be truthful without signing a document written in the employer's words. Ask for the questions in writing and answer them in writing, after you have had time to think and, ideally, after a lawyer has read them. Anything you sign can be forwarded to the Board of Nursing with the employer's report and will be read by an investigator who was not in the room. A refusal to sign an admission is not the same as a refusal to cooperate.
Yes. Under federal law a state licensing board must report an action that results from a formal proceeding, including a consent agreement, a reprimand, probation, a suspension, and a surrender of the license while under investigation, and nurses are covered. A clause saying the Board will not report has no effect. Participation in the R.C. 4723.35 monitoring program is not itself a disciplinary action and, where it is not public and does not restrict the license, is generally not reportable, which is one reason to raise impairment before the Board acts rather than after.
Yes, and on time. R.C. 4723.28(B)(39) makes failing to cooperate with, or to answer truthfully in, a Board investigation its own ground for discipline, and a nurse who does not request a hearing within the time stated in a notice of opportunity for hearing lets the Board decide without one. The response should be complete, truthful, and consistent with what was said to the employer, because the two files tend to meet.
The firm advises on both and coordinates them, because a statement to the employer becomes evidence before the Board and a Board outcome shapes the separation terms and the next job. Where a Board matter proceeds to a Chapter 119 hearing, the firm will tell you plainly whether it is the right fit for the hearing itself or whether to bring in licensure defense counsel alongside it. The employment side, including retaliation, leave, severance, and the reason for separation, is the firm's core work.
Name the employer and what has happened. The first reply is in writing, after a conflict check.
Schedule a Consultation ›