Sexual harassment at work is illegal. Whether it is quid pro quo conduct from a supervisor or a hostile environment built on repeated comments and behavior, the firm represents Ohio employees who have been harassed or retaliated against for reporting it.
Federal and Ohio law recognize two distinct categories of sexual harassment in the workplace. The legal standards and the kind of evidence that matters differ between the two.
A supervisor or other person with authority over your employment conditions makes a tangible job benefit (a promotion, a raise, continued employment) contingent on sexual conduct, or threatens an adverse action if you refuse. A single incident can be enough.
Unwelcome conduct based on sex is severe or pervasive enough to alter the conditions of employment and create an abusive working environment. The conduct does not have to involve sexual touching or explicit propositions; harassment based on sex more broadly (including conduct based on sexual orientation or gender identity) qualifies. Both the frequency and severity of conduct matter, as does the totality of the circumstances.
Federal sexual harassment claims under Title VII generally require an EEOC charge within 300 days of the conduct, with limited exceptions for ongoing harassment. Ohio claims under R.C. 4112 have similar windows, though some claims can be filed directly in court. Acting promptly preserves your options and your evidence.
It is usually advisable but not always required. The law gives employers an affirmative defense if they have an effective complaint procedure and the employee unreasonably failed to use it. Reporting also creates a record. There are exceptions, particularly when reporting would clearly be futile or when the harasser is the highest-ranking person at the company. An attorney can help you decide before you take any step.
Employer liability is essentially automatic when the harasser is a high-ranking official, because their conduct is treated as the company's conduct. The employer does not get the benefit of the affirmative defense that might apply to lower-level supervisor harassment. These cases also tend to involve weaker internal complaint procedures because the harasser sits above the HR function.
Yes. Resigning does not eliminate your claim, but you may need to show constructive discharge if the resignation is the basis for damages. Constructive discharge means the working conditions were so intolerable that a reasonable person would have felt compelled to resign. The standard is high; documenting the conditions and any unsuccessful attempts to address them strengthens the case.
Through documentation, witness testimony, and patterns. Direct evidence (statements, communications) is best when available. Most cases also rely on contemporaneous notes, complaint records, and testimony from other employees who witnessed conduct or experienced similar treatment. Internal complaint records, even if the employer ignored them, are often the most valuable single piece of evidence.
Discuss your situation with attorney Sean H. Sobel. No obligation, no cost to talk.
Schedule a Consultation ›