When most people hear "Title IX and athletics," they think about equal opportunity for women's sports programs. That is an important part of what Title IX does, but it is not the only way the law affects student athletes. Title IX's sexual harassment and misconduct provisions apply with full force in the athletic context, and student athletes navigating a Title IX proceeding face a distinct set of pressures and considerations that other students do not. This post focuses on both dimensions.
Title IX and Equal Athletic Opportunity
Title IX requires institutions that receive federal funding to provide equal athletic opportunities for students of both sexes. This does not mean identical programs or equal spending on every sport, but it does require overall equity in athletic opportunities, athletic financial assistance, and other program benefits including equipment, facilities, coaching, and scheduling.
The Department of Education evaluates compliance with Title IX's athletic provisions using a three-part test. An institution can demonstrate compliance by showing that athletic participation opportunities are substantially proportionate to enrollment by sex, by demonstrating a history and continuing practice of expanding opportunities for the underrepresented sex, or by showing that the interests and abilities of the underrepresented sex are fully accommodated by the current program.
If you believe your institution is failing to provide equal athletic opportunities, you can file a complaint with the Office for Civil Rights or pursue litigation. Title IX retaliation protections also apply, meaning an institution cannot punish a student for raising concerns about athletic equity.
Title IX Sexual Misconduct Proceedings Involving Student Athletes
Student athletes are subject to the same Title IX grievance process as all other students when it comes to sexual harassment and misconduct. But the athletic context creates additional pressures that can significantly affect how a proceeding unfolds and what is at stake for the student involved.
Athletes as respondents
A student athlete named as a respondent in a Title IX proceeding faces consequences that go well beyond what a non-athlete respondent typically faces. In addition to the standard academic and disciplinary consequences, an athlete respondent may face suspension from competition, loss of athletic scholarship, removal from the team, and reputational harm within the athletic program and beyond. These consequences can occur through supportive measures before any finding is made, not only as sanctions after a finding of responsibility.
The visibility of student athletes on campus and in the community adds another layer of complexity. In high-profile athletic programs, a Title IX complaint against an athlete may attract attention from coaches, administrators, boosters, and media in ways that put additional pressure on the process and on the parties involved.
Athletes as complainants
Student athletes who experience sexual harassment or assault face their own distinct challenges when deciding whether and how to report. The team dynamic, relationships with coaches and athletic staff, concerns about playing time or scholarship status, and fear of how teammates will respond can all create pressure against reporting.
It is important for student athletes to understand that Title IX's retaliation protections apply in the athletic context. An institution cannot reduce an athlete's playing time, cut their scholarship, or take other adverse action because they filed a Title IX complaint. If you experience retaliation after reporting, that retaliation is itself a Title IX violation.
Supportive measures in cases involving athletes can include suspension from competition before any finding is made. Respondent athletes should understand that these measures can be challenged if they are disproportionate to the circumstances.
Coaches and Athletic Staff as Respondents
When a Title IX complaint is filed against a coach or athletic staff member by a student athlete, the power dynamic at issue is significant. Coaches control playing time, scholarship decisions, team roster spots, and recruitment recommendations. The inherent power imbalance between a coach and an athlete will be a central focus of any investigation.
As discussed in our post on Title IX and faculty, informal resolution is not available when a school employee is alleged to have sexually harassed a student. When a coach is the respondent, the formal grievance process is required.
The Role of the Athletic Department
One recurring issue in Title IX proceedings involving athletes is the role of the athletic department. Athletic departments have significant institutional power and financial interests that can, in some cases, create pressure on the Title IX process. Institutions are required to ensure that their Title IX grievance process is free from conflicts of interest and institutional bias. If you believe the athletic department's interests are affecting how your proceeding is being handled, those concerns can be raised with the Title IX Coordinator and, if necessary, with OCR.
NCAA and Conference Rules
Title IX proceedings operate under federal law and institutional policy. NCAA rules and conference regulations are a separate framework. In some cases an institution's Title IX process and its NCAA compliance obligations can create tension, particularly when allegations involve conduct that implicates both frameworks. Understanding how these two systems interact in your specific situation is important and may require advice from someone familiar with both Title IX and NCAA compliance.
NCAA eligibility and Title IX proceedings are separate processes governed by different rules. An outcome in one does not automatically determine the outcome in the other. Understanding how they interact in your specific situation matters.
Getting an Advisor Involved
Student athletes involved in Title IX proceedings, whether as complainants or respondents, have the right to an advisor of their choice. Given the additional stakes involved in the athletic context, including scholarship, eligibility, and team membership, having an experienced Title IX advisor from the beginning of the process is especially important.
An advisor can help you understand the process, prepare for investigator interviews, review the investigative report, and represent your interests at the hearing through cross-examination. Learn more about our Title IX advising services for complainants and respondents at institutions nationwide.
The Bottom Line
Title IX affects student athletes in two distinct ways: through the equal opportunity provisions that govern athletic programs, and through the sexual misconduct provisions that apply when athletes are involved in a Title IX proceeding as complainants or respondents. In both contexts, understanding your rights and having experienced guidance available makes a meaningful difference.
About the Author
Sean H. Sobel is the founding attorney at Sobel Law Solutions, LLC, a Cleveland-based employment law and Title IX firm. He has been recognized to Super Lawyers Rising Stars every year from 2014 to 2025 and selected to Super Lawyers in 2026. Sean represents Ohio employees in employment matters and serves as advisor and independent investigator on Title IX matters at colleges and universities nationwide.
Student Athlete Involved in a Title IX Matter?
We advise student athletes and others involved in Title IX proceedings at institutions nationwide. Initial consultations are free and confidential.
Schedule a Free Consultation